Been messing around with some VPN speed tests lately, gotta say, it's kinda wild how much variability there is rn. I mean, I ran multiple tests on different providers, using speedtest.net, fast.com, and even some custom scripts with curl to check raw throughput. Tested on my usual setup - 1 gig fiber, 5 GHz WiFi, connecting to servers in US, EU, Asia. Results? Some providers like NordVPN and Express really push the limits, hitting near 900 Mbps, but others like ProtonVPN? They maxed out at like 300 Mbps on some servers. Protocols matter too, WireGuard vs OpenVPN, for example. WireGuard is faster, obviously, but in some cases, OpenVPN still held its ground, especially on unstable networks. I noticed latency spikes and packet loss showed up more on TCP vs UDP connections, which skewed results. Basically, I'm thinking, what's the real deal? Methodology needs consistency, so I tried keeping server locations the same, testing at similar times to avoid congestion. But even then, the results change - peak times, server load, your ISP's routing. It's a reminder that numbers are useful but gotta consider real-world usage streaming, torrenting, gaming - and those tasks need different tweaks. TL;DR: VPN speeds are kinda like a rollercoaster, depends on protocol, server load, and your network stability. Always do your own tests, don't trust just the marketing figures, fam