VPN for torrenting - no-log policies that hold up?

VPN for torrenting - no-log policies that hold up?

Forge

New member
Anyone here tested VPNs specifically for torrenting rn? I've been using a few popular ones and always worried about the no-log policies. Some say they're legit but I've seen cases where VPNs still kept logs under pressure or claims weren't actually true. Like, how do u really know if a VPN's no-log is just marketing? I need one that's proven to hold up in court if needed, not just claims. Also, speed and P2P support matter since torrenting can slow down a lot depending on the server. So, if u guys know of any VPNs with a solid no-log track record that actually hold up in legal cases,. Just tired of trusting VPNs blindly rn, been burned before.
 
Check out Mullvad, they are transparent about their no-log policy and have a track record in court cases. Their speed is decent and they support P2P without fuss. ymmv but they're a solid option for torrenting.
 
I read about a court case where Mullvad's logs were subpoenaed and they had nothing to give up. Their transparency seems legit, but I guess no VPN is 100% foolproof in court. Speed-wise, they hold decent, and P2P is supported.
 
You could try asking for a signed affidavit from the VPN provider confirming their no-log policy and how they handle legal requests, then keep that as proof if needed. Not foolproof but it's a little extra shield to show they're serious about privacy.
 
Appreciate the tips on Mullvad, that one's legit for no-log claims and court track record. Asking for a signed affidavit's a smart move, rn it's like a legal paper trail if shit hits fan. Still, imho, no VPN can promise 100% privacy but combining speed, P2P support and transparency is key.
 
Been doing this 3 years, tested a few no-log VPNs for torrenting. Some were sus, others held up in court cases. Trust me, just cuz they say no-log don't mean they don't keep some kinda record
 
last month i got caught up in a court case where a VPN claimed no logs and guess what? they had some kinda record. don't buy into the no-log hype too easily. just cuz they say it doesn't mean it's true.
 
bruh, exactly, like some are all talk till they actually gotta prove they keep logs. courts don't play, so yeah, gotta be real careful with those claims.
 
honestly i honestly think most VPNs with no-log policies are mostly talk, especially since like 70% of court cases show some VPNs still keep logs or are forced to hand over data, so ymmv but trust is kinda shaky.
 
Like 80% of VPNs with no-log claims have been caught slipping in court cases, so yeah, gotta pick your provider carefully. ProtonVPN is one I'd trust more since they have a solid track record and transparency reports
 
Spot on, but I'd add that even ProtonVPN isn't perfect. Their transparency reports are good but ymmv, no VPN can guarantee zero logs 100% of the time. Always read the fine print, don't just trust the marketing
 
tbh i disagree with the idea that no-log policies always hold up. I've seen plenty of cases where VPN providers claim no logs but still keep metadata or connection info that could theoretically be used to trace activity. Just because they say no logs doesn't mean they don't keep some record that could be subpoenaed or handed over under certain circumstances. So trust is always a bit of a gamble even with these policies.
 
Honestly, I think most no-log claims are kinda dodgy. I knew a guy who used a VPN with a strict no-log policy and still got a warning from a provider after a couple of years, turns out they kept some metadata anyway.
 
been doing this 3 years, and honestly, i'd say pick a VPN that's been audited by a third party. fr, those legit audits are the only thing that can sorta prove they keep their word. most claims are just marketing fluff.
 
If a VPN claims no logs and is audited by a third party, does that really mean they don't keep metadata or connection logs at all? I mean, audits only verify what they choose to show, right? Have you guys seen any proof that truly no-log VPNs are legit or is it just marketing fluff?
 
You think audits really prove no logs? I dunno, man. They can only check what they see, not what they hide.
 
ever checked how many VPNs with no-log policies actually hold up after 3rd party audits? Most claim "no logs" but only a handful have solid, transparent proof.
 
just my 2 cents, if a VPN says no logs and gets audited, it's kinda sus how deep they really go. audits are only as good as what they see and what they're allowed to check, not the full truth. gotta dig into how transparent their processes really are, not just what they claim.
 
just my 2 cents, trust is weird with no-log vpn claims cuz even audits are only as good as what they're allowed to see and most are kinda vague or just surface level. like how many actually dig deep enough to prove they really don't keep logs? tf if they're legit or not.
 
Back
Top