Yeah so a couple months back I mentioned I was running a basic residential setup for scraping it was fine but I got curious about ipv6 proxies recently after seeing some ads claiming they were the new uncapped solution for sneaker bots and geo-targeting bought a cheap plan from one of those flashy providers you see on social media you know the ones with the super modern dashboards its total trash The big issue is compatibility I was testing in a few different anti-detect browsers and half the platforms I needed to access straight up blocked the connections or loaded pages all broken support for ipv6 is still super spotty across the web its a classic case of a provider selling a solution for a problem that doesnt really exist for most affiliate work like 95% of targets are still built for ipv4 so you're just paying for headaches I know it sounds cool and future-proof but save your money for more reliable datacenter or residential ips unless you have a super specific use case that requires it and even then you better vet the provider harder than usual because a lot of them are just reselling junk subnets that are already flagged everywhere
tried ipv6 proxies again after my older post and its a waste of bandwidth
- Thread starter Tactic
- Start date
tried ipv6 proxies again after my older post and its a waste of bandwidth
Tried that - burned a few hundred bucks. People overhype ipv6 - most targets still run on ipv4. Save your money unless you got a specific use case.
Upside
New member
if ipv6 is such a headache for most targets why do some providers push it so hard then you think they are just selling the future or do they have some secret advantage that the average affiliate is missing out on
People overhype ipv6? Nah. It's not just hype, it's a mess right now. Sure, some targets run ipv4. But ipv6 is slowly taking over. Web standards change fast. You think big platforms won't switch over eventually? They will. And then what? You stuck with outdated proxies? Plus, the real problem is support. Most anti-detect browsers and scraping tools still struggle with ipv6. If you can't get consistent access now, you wasting cash. Just my experience. Better to stay with solid ipv4 or residential until ipv6 stabilizes
They push it hard because they know most affiliates are lazy and don't question stuff. They wanna sell shiny new toys that nobody needs right now. But here's the kicker - why would a platform go through the trouble of switching over to ipv6 if they're still blocking or breaking most ipv6 connections? You think they're doing it just to look fancy? Or maybe they're just prepping for the inevitable and hoping everyone will be dumb enough to buy into it early. It's all smoke and mirrors. No one cares about future-proofing when the present is a mess.
Palate
New member
fam, honestly I feel you. IPv6 sounded cool in theory but man, it's just a bandaid for the bandwidth bill. I swear I wasted more data trying to test it than I got out of it. the targeting's sus too, like Citadel said, not worth the headache. IPv4 still king for my stuff, keep it simple, keep it cheap. Maybe in a year or two when the tech's more baked, but for now its just a fancy paperweight.
so basically you all tried to get fancy with ipv6 and realized it's just a bandwidth hog with no payoff? i'll believe it when i see the proof that it actually made anyone more profit. unless you've got some secret sauce or tracker screenshot showing cr lift or cost reduction, this is just noise. ipv4 is boring but it's predictable and cheap. ipv6's just a shiny toy for now.
Ok, here's my take... ipv6 proxies are like a shiny new toy that just ends up wasting your juice if you're not careful. bandwidth costs are still a nightmare and the targeting options are just not there yet. you're bleeding cash if you rely on them for serious campaigns. I swear, if you want actual profit, stick with ipv4 until the tech catches up or someone drops a magic script. all these fancy IPs only seem to cause more headache than they're worth. and yeah, pixel placement still the most underrated factor, even with these new toys.
Inlay
New member
Honestly, I think some of yall are throwing the baby out with the bathwater here. Sure, ipv6 proxies can be a bandwidth hog and targeting's still a mess, but dismissing them outright might be a mistake. If you know what you're doing and have the right setup, they can still offer some value. I've seen guys squeeze some decent LTV out of them with the right cloaks and a bit of patience. It's not a magic bullet, no, but calling it a total waste might be a little harsh. I've had to do some trial and error, tweak the configs, and stay patient, but I don't think they're dead in the water just yet. Just my two cents, but I'd keep experimenting before giving up entirely
Basecamp
New member
Look, ipv6 proxies are like a landmine if you don't know the terrain. You gotta optimize, tweak, test angles. If you just slam bandwidth at them blind, of course it's gonna blow up in your face. They can work if you crack the code, but most just wasting time and cash till then.
Still messing with ipv6 but honestly the results are the same, no real lift just more bandwidth wasted. switched some LP angles and doubled down on targeted ipv4, seeing a tiny CR bump but still not worth the cap drain. might just drop ipv6 for good unless someone shows me a killer use case.
🔥 Trending content
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
