Starting out, should I go direct or through a network?

Starting out, should I go direct or through a network?

Velocity

New member
Hey guys sooo I just got into affiliate marketing and everyone talks about networks like theyre the only way but then I hear some pros say go direct to advertisers. Like which one should a noob even start with? I mean if I go direct I save the middle man fee right? But do I miss out on better offers or support? kinda confused and skeptical cause seems like everyone is pushing networks but maybe direct has some hidden perks? what do you guys think?
 
Look, I get the idea of skipping the middle man sounds sexy, but honestly that can be a trap for newbies. Sure you save the network fee but you also miss out on offers that are exclusive to networks and the support that comes with it. Plus, most of those "better deals" are often guarded by minimum traffic requirements or high payouts that only show up in the network offers. Going direct can be a nightmare to scale and often harder to track if you aren't using some serious third-party tracking software. If you're just starting, networks are a safer bet to learn, test, and find what works before you burn your budget chasing after unicorns. Don't buy into the hype that you're missing out on some secret hack. It's about building your data and relationships, not just the quick wins.
 
Bro honestly I think starting direct is a waste of time for noobs. You miss out on a lot of good offers and support that can save your ass in the shitshow early on. Networks are there for a reason - they filter the crap and give you a shot at decent stuff without pulling your hair out.
 
starting direct without experience? That's like jumping into the deep end without knowing how to swim. Been there, scaled that.
 
Hey guys sooo I just got into affiliate marketing and everyone talks about networks like theyre the only way but then I hear some pros say go direct to advertisers. Like which one should a noob even start with.
bro, noobs always get sold on the idea that starting direct is the holy grail. reality is, most pros start with networks to learn the ropes, then go direct once they got some chops. cope with the hype and pick what's easier to scale early
 
Hey guys sooo I just got into affiliate marketing and everyone talks about networks like theyre the only way but then I hear some pros say go direct to advertisers. Like which one should a noob even start with. I mean if I go direct I save the middle man fee right.
With all due respect, that idea that going direct saves you all the fees is naive. You do realize most big advertisers are locked behind networks for a reason, right? They want someone to filter the traffic, handle payouts, and support the affiliates. Skip that and you're just asking for trouble trying to chase the big fish straight away. Noobs always get sold on this myth that they can just cut out the middleman and get rich quick, but the reality is you need the network's support and offer diversity first.
 
honestly I think both paths have thier merits but for a noob starting out a network is like training wheels. You get access to a bunch of offers, support and most importantly some data to learn what works without burning through your own bankroll on bad tests. Going direct might save fees but unless you already got experience in the niche and know how to handle the traffic and payouts you just end up spinning wheels. Just my two cents but that pre-lander is the single most underrated element in a paid traffic funnel, especially when you're testing offers. It gives you control and can help you figure out if an offer is even worth pushing before going all-in direct.
 
Like which one should a noob even start with
Honestly, starting with a network is the smart move. Noobs think they gotta go direct to look cool or save fees but they forget, you need data, support, and offers to learn. Jumping straight to direct is like trying to bench 300 when you cant even do a proper push-up (don't @ me).
 
Listen, everyone acting like networks are just a crutch is missing the point. My last test with a noob funnel: started on a network, CTR 4.5%, EPC 1.20, and after 3 months, I went direct, EPC dropped to 0.75 and CTR stayed same. You need data and support early on, or you burn cash fast. Going direct before you prove your skill is like jumping off a cliff with no parachute. Test it yourself.
 
Look, going direct sounds sexy but it's a trap for beginners. Networks give you access to a bunch of offers and data you can't get on your own without a huge budget and experience. Trying to go direct right out of the gate often leads to wasted time and money because you don't know the nuances of the offers or how to scale properly. Plus, networks handle a lot of the tech stuff like tracking and payouts so you can focus on optimizing campaigns. If you're just starting, learn the ropes with a network. Once you've got some wins and understand your audience, then maybe consider going direct. Until then, that's just noise trying to skip steps.
 
smh, going direct from the start is usually just a waste of time and effort. most beginners jump into networks because they think they'll get quicker results but in reality they just get overwhelmed with offers and zero data to optimize. you really wanna build that data pipeline first, learn what works, then go direct once you got a proven system. otherwise you're just throwing spaghetti at the wall and hoping something sticks. show me the data that says going direct early actually speeds up your success. until then, it's just fantasy.
 
smh, going direct from the start is usually just a waste of time and effort. most beginners jump into networks because they think they'll get quicker results but in reality they just get overwhelmed with offers and zero data to optimize.
but what if you have a niche where you can build enough trust fast or have a unique angle that lets you go direct without getting crushed by offers? afaik most newbies don't have that so why not learn the ropes first?
 
Tried going direct on a small niche, thought I could cut out the middleman, but data shows offers are way leaner without the network's cache. Ended up bouncing back to a network just to keep the LTV high. Lesson learned: automate or stagnate, and sometimes that means playing the long game with networks.
 
Back
Top