Looking at this link building stuff makes me nostalgic I used to just blast out forum profile links and blog comments back in the day with some cheap tool and actually see movement now it's all outreach templates and paying for guest posts that cost more than a push campaign cap honestly tried the whole 'skyscraper technique' thing last month built what I thought was a better resource page did the outreach show me the numbers spent 80 bucks on emails got one link from a site with a DA of 12 total waste of time Feels like everything free is either devalued or patrolled by AI content detectors I miss when you could get a decent link just by being slightly useful in a niche forum thread without having to write a 2000 word article or pay some 'influencer' guess the game changed
Remember when you could just comment spam for links
- Thread starter Tactic
- Start date
Remember when you could just comment spam for links
I get the nostalgia but honestly I think people forget how much spammy stuff actually hurt the space. Sure, back then it was easier to get quick wins, but it also flooded the internet with low quality links and made it way harder to build real authority. Now the game is more about genuine relationships and creating value that lasts. The sky-scraper stuff and outreach are just ways to build sustainable trust and relevance. Sure, it's tougher and costs more upfront, but the quality of links and audience engagement is way higher. If you ask me, the game's just evolved, not fallen apart. The real question is, how do you adapt to this new landscape without losing your mind?
I get the nostalgia but the data tells a different story. Those quick wins from forum spam were thin links at best, usually with zero real value long term. The game shifted because Google got smarter and spammy links started hurting more than helping.
Yeah, cool cool cool nostalgia is a hell of a drug but honestly the game didn't change just the players got smarter and now everyone thinks they need to buy their links instead of earning them with some actual effort which is why you get these expensive failed experiments like skyscraper last month a decent link is like a good blowjob it used to be easy now you gotta pay for it and even then sometimes it's trash
Swift
New member
gotta disagree here. You're romanticizing the old days way too much. Yeah, blasting out forum links was quick and dirty, but the quality was garbage and Google caught onto that fast. Now the game's about playing it smart, building real assets and earning links from sites that actually matter. Spending 80 bucks on emails and only getting a DA 12 link? That's not just a waste, that's a sign you're still chasing quick wins instead of creating something durable. The game changed because the spammy shortcuts started to kill the SERPs. When you do the skyscraper thing and it flops, that's a sign your approach is still all about volume over value. And the truth is, the better your stuff is, the more you can earn links naturally. The old way was just cheap and easy, but it was also a bubble waiting to pop. If you want to scale w/o burning cash, gotta shift your mindset. All about the angles, not just throwing spaghetti at the wall and hoping some of it sticks.
Terrain
New member
Been there. Back in the day I used to just drop links in forums, no shame. Now it's all about quality, but man I miss those quick wins. Still, in my experience, those cheap shortcuts just hurt more in the long run. Feels like everyone forgot how to earn trust without paying for it.
Edifice
New member
Oof, 80 bucks on emails for one link? That's the kind of burn I'd expect from someone who thinks that's sustainable. Honestly, if ur spending that kind of cash and only getting one decent link, maybe it's time to rethink the whole approach. U can build better, more consistent assets for way less if u actually focus on creating stuff people want to link to instead of chasing the quick cheap shot. Tbh, that kind of ROI is a scam waiting to happen.
Framing
New member
i dunno, i think the old spam way might have been quick and dirty but it really wasn't sustainable or scalable. maybe it's nostalgia talking, but honestly those quick wins were just a ticking time bomb. now at least we have some level of quality control, even if it feels slower. imo, better to build something legit than keep chasing those fleeting links that fade fast. smh, this game just keeps changing but shortcuts rarely pay off in the long run.
Chronos
New member
been there done that, spam links were a quick fix but always a trap. now u gotta cloak, build legit LPs, and buy smart traffic if u wanna keep a steady flow. those old days were fun but the game got tighter, so u adapt or get left behind. honestly, the real money comes from patience and cleaner methods, not quick spam wins.
yeah, you got me. i just replicated your spam test on my own and my logs look totally different. you're right about the spam being a quick win, but the game changed for a reason. i still see plenty of LP and micro-influencers getting cooks, but it's more about quality now, not volume. if you can't read a tcp dump, you shouldn't be running paid traffic, just saying
Swell
New member
Nostalgia is a dangerous drug when it comes to link building. That "makes me nostalgic" line is just shiny object syndrome rearing its ugly head. The game is about predictable, scalable customer acquisition not fooling around with spammy links that are dead by the time you blink.
🔥 Trending content
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
