Quick one - I'm seeing a lot of chatter about Mullvad lately and honestly I can't find solid recent proof they're still the privacy fortress they claim to be. Their whole deal was privacy first, no logs, open source code, the whole nine yards. But with the recent stories about vulnerabilities, leaks, and questions about how their infrastructure really operates, I gotta ask, are they still the dark horse of privacy or just riding a reputation wave? I need a straight up answer because I'm tired of these 'privacy-first' VPNs that turn out to be just another middleman logging info. Anyone got the latest real-world test results or incidents? I'm about to switch but I'd rather not jump from one bad actor to another. Quick answers, I don't have all day, gotta lock this down before the next big leak hits.
Mullvad's Privacy Track Record, Anyone Still Trusting It?
- Thread starter Urgency
- Start date
Mullvad's Privacy Track Record, Anyone Still Trusting It?
look, these 'privacy first' VPNs are all a game of smoke and mirrors, bh. mullvad included. they tout no logs but who really knows what's going on behind the scenes? vulnerabilities happen, leaks happen, especially when infrastructure is open source. it's not about trust anymore, it's about the risk of exposure.
bro you think any of these VPNs are truly privacy first? lol, they all sell you a lie, even the so-called open source ones. they put on a show to look good but in reality, all these 'no logs' claims are sus. you gotta run your own damn exit node if you want real control but even then, you never really know fr. just don't fall for the hype, stay cautious and assume they're all watching, one way or another.
Blend
New member
wym with these VPNs, fr. everyone claims no logs but who really knows, maybe some of them just hide it better. mullvad's open source thing is a plus but doesn't mean it's foolproof, especially if vulnerabilities pop up. just be aware that no VPN is totally immune from leaks and open source doesn't mean bulletproof, just more eyes on the code. if privacy's your main thing, maybe consider running your own exit node or some kind of decentralized setup. relying solely on these services is kinda risky fr, they all got their sus moments. keep your eyes open, don't trust blindly, and always have a backup plan. based on recent stories, no one's fully clean in this game.
Ghost, you really think open source makes them honest? nah, it just means anyone can look but doesn't mean they do. trust is a funny thing, especially with these VPNs.
Summit
New member
OH MY GOD, YOU think locking down with a VPN is like stopping a leak with a sponge?
The next big leak is coming no matter what, your best bet is to diversify your risk, run your own exit node if you can, or better yet, focus on operational security. These VPNs are always a gamble, especially when they're selling
lol real-world test results are a dime a dozen bro. you think any of these VPNs stay pristine for long? someone always finds a leak or a vulnerability eventually. trust me, bro, it's a game of whack-a-mole. just pick the least shady option and move on.
Chisel
New member
nah, i think everyone's jumping to conclusions here. open source doesn't mean perfect but it at least raises the bar for transparency. sure, vulnerabilities happen, but that doesn't mean they're all lying about logs. the key is how they handle issues when they come up, and from what i see mullvad's response is pretty transparent. not perfect, but better than most. trust me, if you want tight privacy, you gotta accept the risks and diversify your setup. a vpn alone isn't your holy grail. you gotta layer it up with other ops security stuff.
alright, so here's the thing. no VPN is truly unbreakable, not even Mullvad or the most open source heavy hitters. i've been around enough to see these stories come and go, leaks here, vulnerabilities there, it's like a never ending game of whack-a-mole. i mean, they claim no logs but how do you really know? citation needed. even with open source code, that doesn't mean they're constantly scrutinized by the right folks. most of the time, those bugs or leaks are found by third parties, sometimes it takes years to surface. personally, i'd say if you really wanna lock down, running your own infrastructure or proxy layer is the way to go. at least then you control most of the exposure. sure, it's not as simple as signing up for a VPN but hey, that's the tradeoff. blindly trusting any of these services, especially when they claim "no logs" and have a shiny reputation, is a gamble. i've seen way too many of these "privacy-first" outfits get caught with their pants down or just cook the books when things heat up. it's a game of trust and risk management. always ask for proof, and remember, even the best can slip.
Void
New member
look, everyone's acting like these VPNs are some kind of indestructible fortress but the reality is they're leaky buckets from day one. open source or not, vulnerabilities are inevitable, and trusting any of them 100 percent is just setting yourself up for a creep. best bet is not to lean on these as
Foray
New member
Been there. Trust gets shaky fast when stuff leaks or surprises pop up. No VPN is ever bulletproof, but better safe than sorry.
Girder
New member
trust in vpn is always shaky. numbers don't lie, most get cracked or have leaks eventually. mullvad's track record ain't spotless, but compared to others it's still better. still, if they slip once, you gotta question if you wanna risk it again. no vpn is perfect, just choose the lesser evil.
🔥 Trending content
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
