Summit
New member
Alright, so I've been testing ISP proxies from a couple of providers lately and wanna share the cold hard numbers. First off, they sit smack in the middle of residential and datacenter proxies. They claim to be more 'real' than datacenter, but still cheaper and more stable than residentials. I ran a few tests on two providers Provider A and Provider B. Provider A has about 50k ISP IPs, cost around 1.20 per IP per month, but on testing I saw a CVR of about 4.2% for my scraping and automation tasks. Not bad, but the ping times were higher than residential, about 250ms on average. Provider B, on the other hand, has 30k IPs at roughly 1.80 per IP, but the CVR dipped slightly to 3.8%. The ping was a tad higher too, averaging 270ms. So, yeah, better price but a slight dip in performance. What's interesting is the anti-detection angle, they seem to get flagged less than datacenter but more than residential. I think it's all about how they're managed and whether the provider uses decent IP pools or recycled IPs constantly. Bottom line, if you're scraping or automating with strict anti-bot measures, ISP proxies might be worth a shot just watch those CVRs and ping times. Not perfect, but definitely a middle ground worth considering, especially if you're trying to keep costs reasonable w/o totally sacrificing stealth.