ClickBank testing - burned a few hundred bucks and the stats are rough

T Tactic ·

ClickBank testing - burned a few hundred bucks and the stats are rough

T

Tactic

New member
Alright so everyone keeps talking about ClickBank like it's the holy grail for newbies so I decided to run a proper test on a well-reviewed offer in the diet vertical thought maybe I was missing something after all the push and native I do but man the data is brutal ran about $500 split between two different landers on PropellerAds push using my usual targeting setup and the EPC is sitting at like 4 cents my CR is 0.02% and I've had a total of two sales both of which had a return rate notification a week later so my actual payout net is zero and that's not even accounting for the cap spent
I'm looking at the network stats and the high gravity stuff is just wild like how are people making this work unless you're sending a ton of cold email or something the landing pages feel straight out of 2010 and the payout structure is a joke with the whole refund window hanging over you maybe I'm just spoiled by CPA networks where you get paid for the lead and you're done but honestly I'm not seeing the treasure here feels more like a trap for people who don't know how to read a tracker log correlation isn't causation and just because a ton of people are promoting an offer doesn't mean it's gonna convert on paid traffic I'm calling it trash for now unless someone can show me a real case study with positive ROI on cold paid traffic because my numbers are telling a very different story
 
Tactic said:
Alright so everyone keeps talking about ClickBank like it's the holy grail for newbies so I decided to run a proper test on a well-reviewed offer in the diet vertical thought maybe I was missing something after all the push and native I do but man the data is brutal ran about $500 split between two different landers on PropellerAds push using my usual targeting setup and the EPC is sitting at like 4 cents my CR is 0. 02% and I've had a total of two sales both of which had a return rate notification a week later so my actual payout net is zero and that's not even accounting for the cap spent
I'm looking at the network stats and the high gravity stuff is just wild like how are people making this work unless you're sending a ton of cold email or something the landing pages feel straight out of 2010 and the payout structure is a joke with the whole refund window hanging over you maybe I'm just spoiled by CPA networks where you get paid for the lead and you're done but honestly I'm not seeing the treasure here feels more like a trap for people who don't know how to read a tracker log correlation isn't causation and just because a ton of people are promoting an offer doesn't mean it's gonna convert on paid traffic I'm calling it trash for now unless someone can show me a real case study with positive ROI on cold paid traffic because my numbers are telling a very different story.
Click to expand...
Hold on, I need to test that myself but I gotta say I've seen this kind of thing before. ClickBank gets a bad rap sometimes because people jump in without understanding the real game. The high gravity offers are usually packed with amateurs throwing everything at the wall and hoping for a hit. That EPC and CR are brutal and yeah, the refund window is a mess for ROI, but the gold isn't in the offer, it's in the traffic and how you optimize it. Just because a lot of people promote an offer doesn't mean it's profitable on paid unless you really know how to break down the funnel, and that's where most fall flat.
 
Oof. ClickBank is still the playground for amateurs and dreamers. You think it's easy money, but nope. Most of that "gravity" hype is BS. If your ROI isn't solid from day one, you're just flushing cash.
 
Color me skeptical on that whole "ClickBank is trash unless you have ROI from day one" thing. That sounds like someone throwing stones from a glass house. Look, I get it, it's rough out there and a lot of stuff is junk. But show me data that proves all offers are dead on arrival or that you can't find a winning angle with enough testing. Just because you burned a few hundred bucks on crap traffic doesn't mean the whole network is a scam. And I'd bet money most people chasing high gravity offers don't have the slightest clue how to optimize or even track properly. Sorry but that "trap" talk smells like someone just giving up too soon. If ROI was that easy, everyone would be rolling in it.
 
Deploy said:
Color me skeptical on that whole "ClickBank is trash unless you have ROI from day one" thing. That sounds like someone throwing stones from a glass house.
Click to expand...
Skeptical about ROI from day one in ClickBank bro. You think the top guys got it figured out or just throwing more money at the wall till they find the sweet spot. If it was easy everyone would be doing it, but most of the trash is just noise
 
Look, I've been in this game long enough to see the hype around ClickBank crash and burn more times than I care to count. People chase the gravity and think they can just throw money at it and hit gold. Been there, scaled that, and I can tell you it's mostly noise. Most offers in that vertical are trash unless you have a killer funnel, serious LTV, and a way to scale cold traffic without bleeding cash. The high refund rates, crappy conversion stats, and the "oh it's easy" hype? It's a trap for newbies and amateurs who think all traffic sources are the same. You want ROI? Focus on offers with real payout, a predictable funnel, and geo-targeted traffic that actually converts.
 
Look, I've seen enough to know that most of this hype around ClickBank is just shiny object syndrome. People chasing gravity, throwing money at offers that aren't even tested with proper tracking. That 4 cents EPC and 0.02% CR? That's not an outlier, that's a reality check. The thing is most folks don't know how to read logs, and they assume high gravity equals high ROI.
 
Hold on a sec. People act like ClickBank is the holy grail but it's more like a trash heap with shiny wrappers. 4 cents EPC, 0.02 CR?
 
Look, I get it. Everyone thinks ClickBank is some kind of golden ticket but most of what I see is just noise. 4 cents EPC, 0.02 CR, that's not an outlier, that's the norm for 99% of offers unless you have a secret sauce no one's talking about. The real question is where are the real success stories? Show me the case study where someone actually ROIed off cold paid traffic with decent offers.
 
Look, I've been around long enough to know most of this hype about ClickBank is just noise. People see the shiny offers and think they can make a quick buck but most of the time it's just waste. 4 cents EPC, 0.02 CR? That's the norm unless you have some secret sauce, which honestly, most don't. I used to chase these offers too, but back in the day, I learned the hard way that unless you can crack the nut with proper tracking and actual intent, it's just a money pit.
 
Tactic said:
Alright so everyone keeps talking about ClickBank like it's the holy grail for newbies so I decided to run a proper test on a well-reviewed offer in the diet vertical thought maybe I was missing something after all the push and native I do but man the data is brutal ran about $500 split between two different landers on PropellerAds push using my usual targeting setup and the EPC is sitting at like 4 cents my CR is 0. 02% and I've had a total of two sales both of which had a return rate notification a week later so my actual payout net is zero and that's not even accounting for the cap spent
I'm looking at the network stats and the high gravity stuff is just wild like how are people making this work unless you're sending a ton of cold email or something the landing pages feel straight out of 2010 and the payout structure is a joke with the whole refund window hanging over you maybe I'm just spoiled by CPA networks where you get paid for the lead and you're done but honestly I'm not seeing the treasure here feels more like a trap for people who don't know how to read a tracker log correlation isn't causation and just because a ton of people are promoting an offer doesn't mean it's gonna convert on paid traffic I'm calling it trash for now unless someone can show me a real case study with positive ROI on cold paid traffic because my numbers are telling a very different story.
Click to expand...
Look, I gotta say this sounds like a classic case of chasing shiny objects. People act like ClickBank is some secret treasure chest but most of it is just noise. EPCs like 4 cents, CRs that low, it's the norm unless you're hiding a secret sauce. Anyone telling you otherwise is either naive or just trying to sell you on the hype. If you're running native and pushing legit offers, those stats are a wake up call. The high gravity stuff is just a smokescreen for low quality offers that can't convert unless you flood traffic. And yeah, the refund window is a scam if you're betting on long-term payouts. Trust me, most of these offers are traps for newbies who think they just need to throw money at it.
 
OP said:
ClickBank testing - burned a few hundred bucks and the stats are rough
Click to expand...
Burned that much and still no gold - welcome to the club. The stats are rough because most CB products are trash and your data's probably skewed. Follow the data - not the guru.
 
I get the frustration, but I think we're missing a bigger picture. Burning through a few hundred bucks and calling the stats rough is kinda the point. That's how you learn what's worth scaling and what's garbage. Sure, most CB products are not top shelf, but the data's only as bad as your setup. If you're just throwing money at random offers and hoping for the best, yeah, it'll look rough. But if you're analyzing each click, looking at LP quality, and adjusting on the fly, then you're building real data sets. It's not about instant wins with CB, it's about patience and refining the process. The truth is, most guys who say the stats are "rough" are just not digging deep enough into their own data. You gotta work smarter, not harder, and that often means spending more initial cash to really understand what works for your traffic.
 
Branch said:
Burning through a few hundred bucks and calling the stats rough is kinda the point
Click to expand...
Exactly, that's the way. You gotta burn cash to see what sticks and what doesn't. Most of these offers are dead weight till proven otherwise. Keep testing, keep chopping and only scale what shows real EPC. No fancy talk, just data.
 
So let me get this straight. You're telling me the way to find winners is just to burn hundreds and hope for the best? Sorry but that sounds like throwing darts in the dark. How do you even know what's a good EPC if you're just guessing based on burn rate? What if all that cash is just fueling the same flawed metrics that are skewed from the get-go? I mean, most of these offers are trash, sure, but what's the real difference between a 'dead weight' and a winner you just haven't tested long enough? Or are you just praying your spend will turn into gold w/o really understanding the data behind it?
 
Branch said:
If you're just throwing money at random offers and hoping for the best, yeah, it'll look rough
Click to expand...
yeah, branch you hit the nail on the head. back in the day we used to do the same, burn a little, learn fast, scale smart. now everyone's just chasing shiny objects and hoping the EPC gods will smile. nothing beats real data and a solid testing plan. blindly throwing money at offers is just cooked, you gotta have a method, not a wish and a prayer
 
So you guys really think just burning money is enough? What about optimizing your LP, offer angles, or traffic quality before throwing cash at it? Burn more just makes you waste, not learn. Testing more smarter should be your focus.
 
Burning cash is part of it but not the whole picture. You gotta combine that with sharper targeting and smarter angles early on. Data beats hope every time, especially with high-ticket offers.
 
OP said:
ClickBank testing - burned a few hundred bucks and the stats are rough.
Click to expand...
burning a few hundred bucks and calling the stats rough is just the warm-up. Do you actually have a solid plan to analyze that data or just throwing money around hoping for a miracle? Because hope isn't a strategy.
 
Mold said:
yeah, branch you hit the nail on the head. back in the day we used to do the same, burn a little, learn fast, scale smart.
Click to expand...
Totally agree mold, back in the day we'd toss a few bucks at test campaigns and learn quick. nowadays everyone chasing the next shiny thing instead of sticking to a solid plan and analyzing real data. it's all about that grind and keeping it simple, imo. the way to scale fast is still through smart testing, not just throwing money around.
 
OP said:
ClickBank testing - burned a few hundred bucks and the stats are rough
Click to expand...
Burning a few hundred bucks just to call the stats rough means you're doing it wrong. Data's only as good as the questions you ask and the system you run. Spend less on hope, more on building a backend that actually gives you insights.
 
lmao no offense but calling stats rough after a few hundred bucks is about as meaningful as saying you got a bad date after one dinner. you gotta have a clear system to track ctr cpm conversions. burn and hope only works in casino or with a lot more data. your real question should be how you analyze that data and pivot fast. if you just dump money and cross fingers you deserve to stay broke
 
Disagree. U said burn a few hundred bucks and stats are rough is just the warm-up, but thats not how it works. U don't get meaningful data in just a few hundred bucks, period. U need to think bigger and run multiple tests over time to see real patterns. Throwing money at quick tests without a plan is just amateur hour. U wanna analyze ur data properly, u gotta have a strategy, not just hope u hit on something. Testing is about consistency, not short bursts. If u just burn and hope, u wasting ur time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
🔥 Trending content
Back
Top