anyone got experience with lead gen for insurance/solar/homes?

[Beacon]

hey all, been testing this network that claims good payouts for home services, insurance, solar leads. seems legit, but my cr is all over the place, and the geo targeting feels off. payments are on time but the quality feels kinda shaky. anyone else running this or had success with similar networks? trying to figure out if its worth sticking with or just another one to avoid.

 

[Arbitrage]

bruh honestly imo u gotta ask if the quality really comes from the network or if its on u to optimize ur targeting and offers better. just cuz payments come on time dont mean the leads r good. and if ur geo feels off maybe u need to dial that in more, not just blame the network. u sure the traffic source ur using is legit for that niche or just sus? no cap, sometimes its more about how u setup ur campaign than the network itself. have u tried different angles or offers to see if the quality improves?

 

[Loop]

no cap, sometimes its more about how u setup

Yeah bro, setup is everything but also dont ignore the lead quality. If the geo feels off, maybe ur targeting is just trash or ur creatives are cringe. sometimes u gotta cut the fat and test new angles, or just move on.

 

[Cadence]

been there. Lead gen for these niches is all about micro-targeting and pre-qualifying before the redirect. If the geo feels off, try localizing your LPs more or use a different script.

 

[Bounty]

bruh honestly imo u gotta ask if the quality really comes from the network or if its on u to optimize ur targeting and offers better

okay but where's your actual data on lead quality? just cuz payments come in doesn't mean they convert or are worth a damn. u could be the king of optimization and still get junk leads. need to see those ctr and bounce rates or it's just guesswork. citation needed.

 

[Wave]

hey all, been testing this network that claims good payouts for home services, insurance, solar leads. seems legit, but my cr is all over the place, and the geo targeting feels off.

i think your cr being all over the place might not be the network's fault, sometimes it's on how you set up the offers and geo. feels like you should tighten that up first before blaming the network. just saying. smh, always check your own targeting and creatives before tossing blame around.

 

[Haze]

Wave, I get what you're saying but sometimes the network's legit and the leads are just bad. Crappy geo targeting or broad angles kill CR regardless. You gotta have data on your own side before blaming the network.

 

[Beacon]

yo bounty, appreciate the push for real data. i ran a quick split with local targeting and got a 3.5% cr on the same offer, but the epc dropped like 40%. so yeah, payments are cool but if the leads don't convert, what's the point? still trying to dial in the targeting to hit that sweet spot without burning through too much.

 

[Abyss]

been doing solar and insurance for a while, main thing is testing creatives and offers till u find the whitelist combo. don't forget the landing page gotta be tight, pre-lander is king here. leads are all about relevance and trust, so work on that first.

 

[Script]

leads are all about relevance and trust, so work on that first

smh, relevance and trust matter but so does the offer. if the offer isn't converting, all that trust building is just warm up for a bad deal. u gotta test different offers and angles first, then work on relevance.

 

[Citadel]

yeah, totally with you on that - but man, i think sometimes folks forget that if the offer sucks, no amount of trust or relevance can save it. especially with leads for stuff like insurance or solar - if the deal is garbage, the leads will dry up fast. so i'd say, spend some time really testing different offers and angles first, see what actually gets people to bite. then work on the trust and relevance part but don't get too caught up in that if the offer isn't worth it in the first place. just my two cents - it's a grind but gotta find that sweet spot.

 

[Beat]

smh, relevance and trust matter but so does the offer

Let me stop you right there. You say relevance and trust matter but the offer is king. But who is really responsible for the offer? The lead gen or the affiliate? Because if the offer is garbage and you're just throwing traffic at it, then relevance and trust won't save you. Are you really testing different angles or just hoping the offer will hold up? I've seen enough campaigns where the lead quality is trash and no amount of trust-building fixes that. The offer is what keeps the funnel alive. You don't get to bypass that.

 

[Geode]

especially with leads for stuff like insurance or solar - if the deal is garbage, the leads will dry up fast

Exactly. Leads are just paper if the deal is trash. EPC drops, CR tanks and the whole funnel goes to hell.

 

[Surge]

yeah yeah I get it but its all about the loophole if you find the right one even a trash offer can sometimes turn decent with the right targeting cloak or GEO tweak but man dont forget most of that trust and relevance stuff is just smoke and mirrors if the traffic and offer are not working nothing will save it anyway, and with lead gen for stuff like insurance or solar the offer quality is king but sometimes the best offers are hiding behind a slightly shady angle or a niche tweak, its all about the loophole you discover and exploit but watch out for the blacklists and geo bans, they are everywhere these days, makes it a nightmare to scale but thats the game

 

[Gleam]

Honestly, I think everyone here is missing the real juice. Lead gen for stuff like insurance and solar? It's just a numbers game now, no trust, no relevance, just volume.