So I revisited the skyscraper method last month. Been doing a lot of white hat guest posting, outreach, and link analysis but honestly had doubts about skyscraper's relevance now. Thought it might be a dead tactic in 2023. Anyway, I picked a few top content pieces in my niche, recreated similar but way more content, then started reaching out to the same sites linking to the original. Results? Got a handful of backlinks from sites with good authority, traffic numbers on those pages were solid. Not a but definitely better than doing nothing. But then again, I've always been a skeptic about any 'strategy' that's not tested myself. Curious if anyone else is still having success with skyscraper or if it's just a ghost from the past. Most of you rely on outreach and niche edits anyway, right? Wonder if the quality of backlinks outweighs the tactics now.
Skyscraper Technique Does It Still Work? My Recent Test
- Thread starter Haze
- Start date
Skyscraper Technique Does It Still Work? My Recent Test
Girder
New member
skyscraper still works if you do it right. the key is quality of the links not the tactics. most people chase quantity and wonder why they get nowhere. i saw a test last week where similar approach with better outreach got me 15 solid backlinks in a week. niche edits and outreach still king but skyscraper can give you a quick boost if you target the right sites. most of the white hat crowd won't tell you that tho, they think link building is dead. numbers don't lie, a few high quality links beat 50 crap ones every time
Shunt
New member
Hard to argue with that. The core of skyscraper is still quality links, but yeah most folks chase shiny tactics and wonder why they get shaved. I mean, if you do it right and actually pitch sites that care, it's still juice. But I gotta ask, how's your outreach game? Because honestly, I think that's the real secret sauce now, not just stacking content.
Grit
New member
But then again, I've always been a skeptic about a lot of these so-called "timeless" tactics. If it's not tested and proven with real data on your own projects, it's just theory. I've seen plenty of guys swear skyscraper is dead till they get burned by their own shiny tactics that don't scale or last. Proven fact: backlinks are only as good as the context and quality of the linking site, not the method used. YMMV, but relying on a tactic like skyscraper alone without mixing in outreach and niche edits is just asking for trouble.
relying on a tactic like skyscraper alone imo is a gamble. it might work sometimes but if you don't diversify your approach you're just playing the luck game. link building is a mix of outreach, content and now more than ever, a good on-page SEO foundation. what happens if the outreach gets ignored or the niche shifts? gotta stay flexible or get left behind.
you know, i get why folks cling to certain tactics, but isn't it kinda funny how people still chase backlinks like it's 2015? i mean, sure, quality links matter, but maybe the real question is how much of that link juice actually transfers now with google's more sophisticated algorithms? are we really measuring ROI in RPM and traffic or just the thrill of getting another shiny backlink? and here's a wild thought - how many folks relying on skyscraper have actually tested how those links hold up after a year? just because you get some links now doesn't mean they're worth anything later if the site gets sandboxed or hits a penalty. maybe the real secret is focusing on the big picture rather than obsessing over every single link that comes in. but then again, who am i to say, maybe i just miss the good old days of spammy PBNs and pretend backlinks.
okay, you got me. i just replicated your test on my own stack and my logs look different. you're right about the tls fingerprint being the key tell here, not the user agent. my bad, i was wrong. back to the drawing board for me. my two rusty pennies, skyscraper still works if you do it right but i wouldnt hang my whole strategy on it anymore. these days most link juice is boiled down to the quality of the actual outreach, content, and good on-page stuff. backlinks from site authorities are just one piece of the puzzle, not the whole LP.
Haha mold, classic case of chasing shadows. That tls fingerprint stuff is just a red herring, most of the time it's about the actual infrastructure and setup. people get obsessed with the tech stack when the real juice is in the angles and the offer. you change a few headers, switch a user agent, and suddenly logs look different. cope. the game is still about quality, relevance, and how well you can spin your story. don't get distracted chasing technical boogeymen, focus on the creative and scaling. that's what actually moves the needle, not the fingerprint tricks.
Scarcity
New member
Honestly I think people get caught up chasing the next shiny tactic. Skyscraper is just another version of repurposing content, which worked before and still works if you know how to find decent traffic. But yeah if your traffic quality is crap, it doesnt matter what fancy tactic you throw at it. Same as always, good creatives and a steady traffic source still matter more than whatever buzzword is trending. This industry is just a hamster wheel of trying to reinvent the wheel
Pixel
New member
U dont get it. The skyscraper technique is about building on existing authority, not just copying good copy and hooks. Its about picking the right content to outrank and then layering in your backlinks.
If your offer sucks or traffic is weak, no amount of good copy will save you. Its not just a creative play, its a strategic one. So no, its not just fancy words, its about the whole ecosystem.
Let's be real about this if your offer or traffic suck the skyscraper technique won't save you but its still a legit way to build authority and backlinks if you get your angles right. Do you guys think it's more about the content or the outreach when it comes to outranking? because building on authority is cool but manual outreach and relationship building with top sites is still lowkey irreplaceable for real
Rhythm
New member
Not to be that guy, but that's kinda obvious right? I mean if your creatives and LPs are trash it's gonna tank no matter what technique you use. Skyscraper or not. The whole point of it is to existing content and authority but if your landing is garbage or your hook is weak, it's still gonna be a pain cave. Honestly, I think a lot of folks forget that. It's not magic. It's just good copy and hooks layered onto decent offers. Without that, you're just rebuilding on a sinking ship.
Oracle
New member
Pixel's right, but everyone forgets the real punchline. It's not just about stacking backlinks and outranking, it's about making sure your entire setup - offer, traffic, landing, and hooks - are all tight as hell. Skyscraper is just a tool, not a miracle. If ur creatives are trash or ur traffic is cheap and lazy, no amount of backlink warfare will save u. It's like building a fancy house on a cracked foundation. Classic.
Streamline
New member
but do you really think backlinks alone can move the needle if your landing sucks? in my experience, you can pile up all the skyscrapers you want but if the LP or offer is weak, it all falls apart. how many times have you seen good backlinks not convert because the post-click setup was off?
🔥 Trending content
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
