Proxy APIs vs Proxy Lists - Real Results Breakdown

S Sketch ·

Proxy APIs vs Proxy Lists - Real Results Breakdown

S

Sketch

New member
tested both for a few weeks. grabbed 100k requests with provider A's proxy api and 100k from provider B's proxy list. api avg cpm was like 2.8, bounce rate 15%. the list? same load but cpm fell to 1.9 and bounce shot up to 30%. why? api proxies are cleaner - less ip churn, less detection. list ones are more raw, often stale, more bans, more retries. data's clear tbh. if you want stability and speed go api. if you're just messing around or cheap? lists can work but expect slowdowns and bans. watch out for providers selling cheap lists with no freshness guarantee, i had one that got blocked in a day. api guys charge like 0.01 per request, list sellers do 1k ips for $20 but half are dead or flagged. imo if your budget's ok go api - saves time and headaches. but if you're starting out test both, keep an eye on bounce rate, and decide based on your sites and workload
 
yep exactly but don't forget even "clean" proxies can get flagged if your behavior screams spam. best tip? rotate your user agents too, not just IPs, to stay under the radar.
 
bruh, 100k requests each? thats a decent test but honestly I wonder if the bounce rate and CPM change is just about quality or maybe the timing? like, maybe the list proxies got stale real quick. lol. still, API proxies seem more reliable for serious work.
 
disagree - i think the real difference is not just proxy type but how you manage them, rotation, user agents, etc. 100k requests ain't much to judge stability in my book
 
Careful with that advice, rotating user agents helps but if your proxies are junk or stale it won't save you. kinda like putting lipstick on a pig. proper proxy management is more than just swapping UA strings, ymmv.
 
appreciate the tips guys, rotation is king no doubt. yeah timing and freshness matter, but overall api proxies just stay cleaner longer. 100k aint massive but enough for a decent read, imo. keep testing and adjusting, that's the game
 
why does everyone always try to pick a side like it's a battle lol? just use what works best for ur campaign lowkey
 
bruh, I disagree lol. I've seen API proxies crush it for automation and scale, while lists work better for quick tests. different strokes for different folks.
 
Proxy APIs vs Proxy Lists - Real Results Breakdown Dude, I gotta say my experience is totally different. I started with proxy lists and they worked fine for quick testing, but once I moved to API proxies for automation, my success rates shot up and I could scale faster. It's all about what you need, but don't sleep on APIs if you want serious uptime.
 
Different angle: I think it's all about the use case. API proxies are sick for automating and scaling stuff but I've had plenty of success with lists for quick and dirty tests. Sometimes u just need that fast setup without fussing with API calls. both got their place, just gotta pick right tool for the job
 
yo honestly I think it depends on the project. API proxies can be a pain to set up but they save a lot of time in the long run if you need scale. Lists are quick but kinda limited and more fragile if you're automating
 
actually, I think you got the stats mixed up. my experience says proxy lists are more reliable for stable long-term use, while APIs are better for quick automation. you sure about the "real results" claim?
 
tbch, ive used both and honestly, the success depends more on how u manage them than the tech itself. i'd say 70% of the time it's user skill, not whether it's an API or list
 
last month i tried both for a small campaign and honestly, the results kinda depend on how u handle them, not just the tech itself. always felt like ppl overthink it sometimes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
🔥 Trending content
Back
Top