Alright I gotta vent. Every time I see one of those comparison blog posts about residential proxy cost per GB I want to scream. They list 20 providers with a clean little table like it means anything. You see the $8/GB provider and think 'oh nice that's cheap'. Then you run 10GB through it and the conv rate is trash because the IPs are recycled so hard they're basically datacenter rejects painted blue. What's the real cost per successful action? That table never shows that. My last test: Provider A at $12/GB gave me 2.1% success on a shopify task. Provider B at $18/GB gave me 8.7%. So which is cheaper? The 'cheap' one cost me $5.71 per success. The 'expensive' one cost $2.07. But you'll never see that math in the pretty blog posts. They just want the affiliate click. Fwiw I'm not naming names but you know the ones. All that 'unlimited bandwidth' talk is just bait for people who don't track actual results. Sarcastic slow clap for the seo-optimized comparison industry. Pay for performance, not per gig. Numbers don't lie but people curating them do. Scraping by, literally.

careful with those blog posts. I use proxyproof.io, tracks success rates real time, helps see true CPL. Cuts out the fluff and helps me pick cheaper options that actually convert

lol yep

haha, yeah those blog posts are like buying a lottery ticket with a fancy spread sheet. Who cares about the GB cost if the success rate makes it all pointless? Ever wonder how many actually realize they're just throwing cash at recycled IPs?

Yep exactly, those tables are mostly smoke and mirrors. The real cost is always hidden in success rates and actual results not gigabytes. People forget that, lol. No one talks about how recycled those IPs are or how it kills conversions, just pretty numbers.

Been doing this 3 years and honestly, those numbers are just eye candy. I swear most ppl don't even think about the success rate, just the gig cost. It's like buying a car based on the sticker price and ignoring how often it breaks down.

Been doing this 3 years and honestly, those numbers are just eye candy. I swear most ppl don't even think about the success rate, just the gig cost. It's like buying a car based on the sticker price and ignoring the insurance and fuel. Until you track success per action, those tables are just marketing noise.

Have you actually tested enough providers to say the success rate variance is the main issue? I've seen plenty of cases where even a cheap provider with recycled IPs can outperform more expensive ones if the targeting is better. Cost per success depends more on how you set up your campaigns and less on just raw GB pricing. Sometimes I find the high-dollar providers give more consistent IPs which matter more than just success rate stats.

ngl just my 2 cents, I tested a handful of providers and the success rate swings can be huge even with the same price point. Once I had a cheap one with recycled IPs that actually worked better than pricier options that churned out junk. ymmv but it's always a gamble with these so-called "unlimited" deals.

just my 2 cents, if you wanna get real value, track success rate and cost per action across multiple providers instead of just gig price. Build a small spreadsheet and log your results over time, ymmv but it'll help you see the real ROI. That way you can cut out the crappy recycled IPs and stick with what actually works for your campaigns.

yeah totally, I had a similar experience. sometimes the IP quality or targeting beats the price all day. just throwing money at the cheapest isn't the move. gotta test and track success rates myself.

careful with that tho, sometimes the good IPs are also recycled or throttled. you gotta keep testing and not just rely on reputation alone. what works today might tank tomorrow, so always be on top of your success metrics.

Been doing this a few months and fr, success rate tracking is king. Reputation stuff is just a piece of the puzzle, gotta keep testing different IPs and providers.