Building an affiliate team, outsource or in-house?

H Haven ·

Building an affiliate team, outsource or in-house?

H

Haven

New member
Trying to decide if I should hire people or just keep doing it all myself. Sounds easy, like just outsource and grow, but then I hear all these stories about teams falling apart or quality going down or getting ghosted by some new 'superstar' hire. Is it even worth the hassle or should I just stick to my own grind? Anyone actually put together a team that didn't become a total disaster? Would love some honest advice or horror stories, maybe just some tips on what to avoid.
 
Honestly, keep it simple at first and build slowly, make sure to check references tight and set clear expectations early, that's how you dodge a lot of headaches
 
Been doing this 3 years and honestly I've had a mixed bag. Some teams were solid, others fell apart fast. The key is hiring slow and managing expectations tight, but even then, no guarantee it won't blow up eventually.
 
man honestly, the key is not just time but experience, you learn who to trust and who to avoid and that takes some hits along the way but keep your expectations real, not every hire will be a home run but it's all about filtering and managing expectations tight, lol.
 
Careful with thinking it's all smooth sailing once you hire, I've seen too many folks jump in thinking it's just about finding the right person and then chaos ensues, especially if you don't have solid processes in place from the start. I've been through enough team
 
Yep exactly, I've been down this road. I tried outsourcing a few times, had some legit good hires but also a few ghosters and bad quality. ngl, I ended up doing a lot myself anyway cause trusting someone else's a gamble, especially early on.
 
honestly last month I almost pulled the trigger on a team, but then I realized I had mixed up outsourcing with delegation. My tip is to start small and set clear expectations. Don't try to hand over your whole operation right away, test a few tasks first, see how they handle it before trusting them with the big stuff.
 
don't buy into the idea that you've been thru enough teams like it's some badge of honor, that's just fatigue talking, building a solid team is about refining your vetting process and setting strict standards from the start, not about how many disasters you survived
 
just my 2 cents, do you think maybe you're mixing outsourcing with just delegating? like, you can outsource some stuff but still keep control and vet hard. or maybe just get a small, tight team and focus on quality over quantity?
 
i think most ppl overthink it, it's not about the hassle but more about if you got the right system. if u hire right, outsource smart, and keep control, it's not so bad. otherwise yeah, chaos city
 
just my 2 cents, building a team is like walking a tightrope, gotta vet super hard and set clear boundaries or it turns into chaos quick lol. ymmv but i swear, if u keep control and don't get lazy, it's doable without disaster. keep grinding, team or no team.
 
Last month I almost pulled the trigger on a full team, but after some bad hires and ghosting, I decided to stick with outsourcing only the core stuff. Learned to vet harder and keep a tight control on quality. Honestly, building a team ain't for everyone, especially if you don't wanna deal with the drama.
 
Last month I tried outsourcing some content creation and it worked okay, but I felt like I lost some control over the quality and brand voice. In-house team can be more aligned but slower to scale. Do you think the trade-off is worth it for someone just starting out?
 
Careful with thinking outsourcing always means losing control. I've seen some affiliate teams do killer with a solid project manager and clear briefs. Sometimes the right outsourcer can match in-house quality if you manage it tight. ymmv though.
 
Bruh, building a team depends on your scale and control freak level. Outsourcing can be quick but tricky on quality; in-house gives ya more say but takes time to grow. Fwiw, mixing both sometimes works best, if you got the project management game down.
 
80% of my rev came from an in-house team for a while, then I outsourced a few roles and saw quick scale. But I had to micromanage the hell outta both. anyone else notice a big quality gap when switching?
 
different angle: do you think micromanaging is more a sign of bad processes or bad ppl? sometimes it feels like it's the org structure or training that's the real issue not the team itself, lol.
 
different angle: I think micromanaging is more about bad processes or training than team type. Outsourced or in-house, if your systems suck, you'll be stuck micro-managing either way. Fix that first, then outsource or hire in-house based on actual needs.
 
Different angle: I think micromanaging is more about bad communication or lack of trust, not just processes or training. You can have perfect systems and still micromanage if you don't trust your team, whether in-house or outsourced.
 
Been doing this 3 years and honestly think it's about your vibe and trust more than outsource or in-house, if you micromanage always some broken process or trust issue underneath, smh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
🔥 Trending content
Back
Top